It seems that there is a presentation of Derrida 's deconstruction in Keats ' Ode on Grecian Urn. Ode on Grecian Urn was written in May 1819 by John Keats and published a year later when Keats died in February 1821. It is a trying to refrain from traditional ways of looking at world in order to create different monitoring. The term Deconstruction first came from Jacques Derrida 's paper "Structure, Sing, and play in the Discovers of Human Sciences" .Base on Derrida 's deconstruction a writer is not able to express his intention through his writings. Therefore a gap between sender and receiver is created, which makes duality and ambiguity. Keats in his ode expresses, in state of negative capability, that this duality is necessary. The deconstructive critics allocates that the meanings are created through 'difference ' and 'opposition '. Keats ' ode is example of mysteries and doubts. The assumption of deconstruction was begun from concepts of 'difference ' and 'binary opposition '. This paper aims to study the aspects of 'Deconstruction ' in 'Ode on a Grecian Urn '. Derrida 's deconstruction can be seen in Keats ' Ode to the Grecian Urn. The poet expresses his feeling about imaginative world of art, in contrast to the reality of life when he watches an engraved urn. For Keats imagination is a way to understand real life. This contradiction between ideal and reality is one of the elements of Deconstruction. "Deconstruction declares that has an almost infinite number
This quote was mentioned before but is a great example to show the imagery he used. “It is a melancholy object to those who walk through this great town, or travel in the country, when they see the streets, the roads and cabbin-doors crowded with beggars of the female sex followed by three, four, six
In a letter to his brother, the great painter, Vincent Van Gogh, once wrote,“Poetry surrounds us everywhere, but putting it on paper is, alas, not so easy as looking at it”. In this quote, Van Gogh summarizes a subject great writers like Ralph Waldo Emerson has devoted entire essays to defining and explaining, and that is the subject of poetry. As it can be seen, a poet undertakes that almost impossible job of transposing what he or she sees in Nature on to paper for others to read. Only a true poet can be successful in an attempt. It is not just Nature a poet tries to capture into words, but also social experiences and human truths.
Daniel Halpern
Poems are not only words, they are further more than that. Poems are a way for the poet to express their feelings, thoughts, ideas, and point of views. Poets can create poems that are fiction and made up or poems that give real-life situation, but,it will always have a purpose or a life lesson. Every poet has their own way of writing and way of building an idea in a reader 's mind. This essay will analyze a well known poet named Daniel Halpern.
Gasset said: “Tears high noon of the intellect”. Dehumanizing is a means by which we can sober up from the drunken stupor of Romanticism’s emotionalism (Siedell, 2009).
Gasset believes that dehumanization is a process that requires an ever-present tension of subject manner. Gasset said: “The question is not to paint something
Strong
Born in San Francisco, Jana Harris is the author of “Don’t Cheapen Yourself”, a poem empowering woman. This poem was created at a time when women were fighting for equal rights. In the poem the subject, who appears to be a young woman, is confronted by her mother who calls her “sleazy” (line1). This would suggest her mother does not agree with the selections of clothing of her daughter, since she is accustomed to more conservative ways for a woman to dress and present herself in public.
Society, for centuries, has revered poetry for its beauty, philosophy, and unique capability to reveal truth to the individual. One of the most prominent time periods that display society’s acclaim for poetry was within the Romantic period. Romanticism, according to the New World Encyclopedia, was “an artistic and intellectual movement that ran from the late eighteenth century through the nineteenth century. It stressed strong emotion as a source of aesthetic experience” (New World Encyclopedia, 2015). Romanticism glorified art, poetry, music, and nature.
What is deconstruction in literature? According to Merriam Webster, a deconstructionist literary criticism is a “philosophical or critical method which asserts that meanings, metaphysical constructs, and hierarchical are always rendered unstable by their dependence on ultimately arbitrary signifiers” (Merriam). In other words, a deconstructionist literary criticism looks at the book as a whole and deconstructs the pieces of the novel and how they may seem unstable when compared to the whole meaning. This mindset is exhibited in that of The Metamorphosis by Franz Kafka. Franz Kafka leaves many aspects of the novel unexplained and he includes details that are unstable to the meaning of the novel as a whole.
Binary opposition/operation clouds a reader’s view to see another side of the text. A majority of people would hail one concept or thing over another, such as fire and water. One may immediately see fire as destruction, while water cleanses. By viewing it this way, a reader can miss the way that instead of the fire destroying something, it is erasing the bad and making room for improvement. In deconstruction, the reader must see that favoritism and reverse it to see more possibilities.
We can not communicate with animals as Derrida talks about his little cat in his seminal essay The Animal That Therefore I Am and says there is no common language or a language we can understand animals. It is not like they say “mirr” to say no or “purr” to say yes. We differentiate animals and categorise them: dogs, cats, snakes, lions and many other. However we kind of categorise humans as well by their races, African, Asian and European, by their gender; male or female, by their preference of opposite sex; straight or gay and many other. So what is boundary we created between “animals and humans?
Through this query, Oates succeeds in reminding her audience of both their need to give significance to meaningless subject matter and that nature falls into the former category. Her use of quotations on the word “creativity” in and of itself debases her audiences’ self esteem because it could make them rethink how that word really applies to them. Through her mocking tone, Oates dismisses the instigators of the reverence of the natural world. She lost this deference to nature a long time ago she lost through separate and traumatizing encounters with
Erdrich’s use of strong imagery and sensory language leads to striking and vivid diction in her poem. Painting a picture of what this tragic scene looked like while she also gives light to the actual situation going on, asserts the story Erdrich is trying to get across. She begins with “The stream was
Besides the author and the reader, there is the ‘I’ of the lyrical hero or of the fictitious storyteller and the ‘you’ or ‘thou’ of the alleged addressee of dramatic monologues, supplications and epistles. Empson said that: „The machinations of ambiguity are among the very roots of poetry”(Surdulescu, Stefanescu, 30).
The ambiguous intellectual attitude deconstructs both the heroic commitement to a cause in tragedy and the didactic confinement to a class in comedy; its unstable allegiance permits Keats’s exemplary poet (the „camelion poet”, more of an ideal projection than a description of Keats actual practice) to derive equal delight conceiving a lago or an Imogen. This perplexing situation is achieved through a histrionic strategy of „showing how”, rather than „telling about it” (Stefanescu, 173 ).
He suffers from psychological complexes, that alienated him from society, and he 's unable to face the realities of life. This research indicates the modern theme of breakdown, absurdity, uselessness, loneliness, and bitterness of life. The protagonist also realizes that the escape from the responsibilities is not a solution to life 's problem. A person ought to create a struggle for his survival, otherwise, there 's the decay of humanity in alienation. In the novel, the author appears to
Nothing But Death Analysis.
Nothing But Death, The poem from Pablo Neruda translated and edited by Robert Bly. The poem presented about the looks of the Death and about how the death appears around the human.
